Hobo

joined 1 year ago
[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (13 children)

They're bugs. Major ones. Fundamental flaws in the program. People with a vested interest in "AI" rebranded them as hallucinations in order to downplay the fact that they have a major bug in their software and they have no fucking clue how to fix it.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Ctrl+f code has to be some of the most efficient automation ever written. Time spent was probably about day and the time saved in work hours is probably in the trillions at this point.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Actual meaning if you're curious are Lemon Laws.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Hackers: Because arcades don't really exist anymore and no one cares about the high score on for the ones that are still around.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

The above comment has also been consumed by AI for training purposes.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They're all fun and games until you're in stop go traffic. I agree though I miss driving a manual. Also they were easier to work on and tended to be cheaper to fix. That might not be the case anymore considering you're pretty much guaranteed to to have to special order parts.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

) You trying to throw a syntax error buddy?

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Addicting maybe but they literally are not drugs. More akin to gambling addiction then any sort of drug dependency. There's a gigantic difference between the two. Sort of bothers me when people throw them in the same pile as they are so much different when it comes to how to deal with those types of addiction.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well it has something to do with election cycles cause Republicans will block this every way they can. So the only way for it to even have a shot is for Democrats to take both the House and Senate with a 2/3 majority to be able to make a constitutional amendments. I sincerely doubt that would happen. After that it would take a very long political slog to ratification. Which again, I don't have high hopes for it to get through the States.

Election cycles are how people get elected, so it has a lot to do with election cycle leaning very heavily towards the Democrats for it to not be DOA. Then it has a long uphill battle to get it ratified by the states. To say that it has a slim chance of going anywhere is really overstating the chances of it happening.

view more: next ›