13esq

This is an engineering question and engineering questions almost always come down to "do you have enough time and money?"

Since the time scale is two weeks, we only need to know if the Israel had enough resources (bull dozers, wrecking balls, bombs, personnel etc. I don't have that information, but it doesn't sound impossible. If a man can be put on the moon, a city could be bulldozed in two weeks.

The person on the other end of the line was hamas.

foiled again by quick lemmers

There's a post from two days ago saying tomatoes, you weren't foiled, you just didn't bother to read the comments before posting.

Neoliberalism

Right. Blocking people for no other reason than "I disagree" or "I don't like that" turns the place in to an echo chamber. Like, if that's what you want, fine, but one reason I left Reddit was to get out of the echo chamber.

There are loads of vegans that are lovely, reasonable people, but unfortunately they get shadowed by the much less reasonable outspoken ones.

I'm a "carny" btw

One of my favourite things about super was to see the original Goku character come back. A goofy and loveable guy that's a savant when it comes to fighting and just wants a bigger challenge.

Hercule. Not only is he fucking hilarious but without him the fights against Cell and Buu would have been lost.

In the Cell games he showed incredible bravery to throw 16's head over to Gohan, enabling Gohan to hear the words he needed to go super sayin 2.

In the Buu saga, he befriended a monster, he showed kindness and compassion that was nearly able to end the fight before it even started. This later caused the good and evil buu's to split. Without Hercule, Goku would not have been able to power up the spirit bomb that finishes Kid Buu.

Nice. Congratulations to the junior doctors, well deserved.

To be fair, some phones already have that but they have much lower spec cameras/lenses, so it's currently a trade off.

If a flag ship phone were to find away to implement a flush top spec camera, it would still only be an incremental improvement rather than a great new technology or a substantial innovation.

Yh, I'm not for bailing out companies that are "too big to fail", I see it as socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor, but that's a separate debate.

Tech stocks were a interesting case as they bloated far beyond their actual value during COVID, what happened in 2023 was probably somewhat of a renormalization and now they're back to business as usual. There will always be peaks and valleys, but I'd be very surprised to see tech stocks fail in the long term.

I'm not going to argue that there has been no progress, just that it's not on the same scale.

Look at the difference between phones from 2004 to 2014, then from 2014 to 2024 and surely you'd have to agree. We're looking at huge leaps in tech and innovation Vs much smaller incremental improvements.

And I'd once again like to state that this is not a complaint, just a point of view showing that astonishing amounts of technological innovation are not necessarily required to keep companies in business.