this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
171 points (100.0% liked)

News

22956 readers
2461 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

This is a huge step. Plastic recycling is a scam literally designed by advertisers to sell more plastic. Much plastic marked as recyclable is not; much cannot be recycled in most areas; much that is technically recyclable cannot be recycled due to cost related to contamination.

It's something like 70-80% of Aluminium is recycled globally. For plastics, that number is around 8 or 9 percent.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Its been proven that the recycling symbol is placed on things that are not actually known to be recyclable - e.g., yogurt containers - to get people to feel better about buying plastic

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It's actually not the recycling symbol, it's a plastic identifier symbol that is, for some crazy unknown reason, designed to be very similar to the recycling icon.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 1 points 3 days ago

Oh I think we all know why...

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Docus@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The article is a bit shitty. I’m sure exxon-mobile are lying about something and i do not want to defend them. But the article does not spell out what they said on this topic that was actually a lie, and goes on to state how much was actually recycled - plastic recycling is a complex topic, but the fact that not everything that can be recycled is actually recycled is hardly exxon’s fault

[–] comador@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

This one is a bit better:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-plastics-lawsuit-exxon/

"The attorney general's office pointed to industry documents from the 1970s calling plastics recycling "infeasible" and casting doubt that recycling plastic could ever be economically viable, according to the April announcement."

"Bonta specifically named Exxon's advanced recycling program as being misleading Monday. "92% of plastics in advanced recycling become transportation fuel — only a very small amount is recycled," he said. "Exxon can only recycle about 1% of its own plastic.""

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Oh, come on. Nobody actually believed that recycling was viable except the simpletons that the politicians lied to repeatedly about it. We had seen enough pictures of yards full of plastic that would just "disappear" when it was found.

Now they're clutching their pearls and lying again. Certainly the oil companies bear a level of responsibility, but it was bullshit all the way down the supply chain to the consumer that gave us a plastic world.