this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
61 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

58306 readers
1783 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

One law, which took effect immediately, makes it illegal to distribute "materially deceptive audio or visual media of a candidate"

Genuinely fantastic.

in the 120 days leading up to an election and in the 60 days following an election.

…why would you restrict it like that..?

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Because it's not a fix, it's a concept of a fix. It's intentionally gutless.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The only way this gets past the first amendment is if it can be specifically tied to elections. It's already being challenged in court. The GOP is funding it.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If this is ML-targeted, frankly it’d be a great test case for making the judicial system decide whether content generated largely or wholly by a machine learning system shall even be considered as “speech” in the traditional sense, since it’s the system doing the “speaking”, not a human, and the Bill of Rights does not offer any protection to non-humans.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That would hurt the bottom line of the investors, so I doubt the Supreme Board Room goes that way.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Because they don't want to punish people who create things about a random person who later becomes a candidate a year from now.