this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
321 points (93.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

32136 readers
1217 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 89 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sorry, I'm gonna be that person.

*What. It should say What it feels like.

[–] soeren@iusearchlinux.fyi 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Thanks English is not my native language.

[–] gbuttersnaps@programming.dev 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just for the sake of information, the two common ways to put this in English are "How it feels" and "What it feels like". The former phrase is just descriptive, so it doesn't need the "like" at the end. The latter phrase is comparative to another thing, so it needs the like. Also this is something that native speakers mix up all the time, so don't worry too much; your English is great!

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the explanation.

[–] glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Der Name Sören ist definitiv ein Hinweis darauf :D

[–] soeren@iusearchlinux.fyi 4 points 1 year ago
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Technology we could never dream of on Reddit

[–] OhTheMoose@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Or "How it feels"

I feel like there's been a gradual increase in people saying things like this ("would of" instead of "would've", "apart" instead of "a part", etc)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lemmy_st3v3@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't get it. In my opinion React is like the worst of the bunch...

[–] vreraan@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When it came out in its time it wasn't bad compared to the alternatives. Now there is certainly better, but honestly it will still take a long time before we can choose a standard.

[–] incapable@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Now that would be something, developers choosing a standard.

mandatory xkcd

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] azezeB@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] lemmy_st3v3@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Well, I have worked with two of them React and Angular. Now working with React. And the further the project goes, things just get messy, and I mean really messy. The concept of everything should be a small function is in practice not true. No dependency injection(I know you can bolt another library on top of it, but really?). The testing is a pain, it gets harder and harder to test isolated functions. Custom tags, attributes that look like the standards that are documented at MDN but are not. And most info I can find online feels like elaborate propaganda. I mean there is just nothing against React to be found, really nothing. That's just not possible in IT.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree, React sucks. Been using it for years at work.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm gonna tell your boss you said that.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Oh he knows 😂

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have tried some angular, threw up when I looked at JSX so skipped React and do a lot of Vue, Vue is by far the best of the 3. especially 3 with reusables and better TS support.

[–] abaga129@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That was my experience until I tried Svelte. I loved Vue but didn't like the transition to Vue 3. When I tried Svelte it blew me away and I never looked back.

[–] dzervas@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

i found out about htmx just yesterday and I was blown away. i think it’s an amazing idea, really

for small projects that you want to make in less than an eternity it should be very convenient

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I... kinda find htmx to be better than all other options.

[–] soeren@iusearchlinux.fyi 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] phundrak@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends on the use case tbh, but it's a good choice in a lot of cases.

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] phundrak@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

I did not know about this, I'll take a look at it once I'm home. Thanks!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 20 points 1 year ago

I was genuinely confused why people were talking about xhtml again this year.

[–] unreachable@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

PHP sitting in the corner, off screen

[–] raubarno@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 year ago

PHP is powering a LAMP

[–] incompetentboob@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m confused as to what PHP has to do with JavaScript front-end frameworks.

Was it just for a quick laugh and a jab at PHP because it’s an easy target or have I misunderstood that these all use JavaScript

[–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I’m confused as to what PHP has to do with JavaScript front-end frameworks.

PHP deserves honorable mention here as the "it's not stupid if it works" of the JavaScript framework world. Everything* JavaScript frameworks can accomplish can also be done (much worse) with static HTML delivered by PHP.

*Please no one give me examples that cannot be done without JavaScript. Trust me, I know. But any business requirement can be met with plain HTML if you really deeply hate your end users enough.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 4 points 1 year ago

what PHP has to do with JavaScript front-end frameworks.

Everything. Sitting in the corner, munching and handing out cookies to people who don't want any.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago
[–] thenofootcanman@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Scrappy@feddit.nl 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's wrong little man, can't handle a little boilerplate?

[–] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry I can't hear you over all those observables

[–] thenofootcanman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] thenofootcanman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

So...dense... Can't... Move...

[–] CodingCarpenter@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm still on DHTML, ActiveX, and SSIs

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fabulous memories. IE 4 and XML data islands too?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Alright, have to ask: what are those icons?

I think I know Vue and Angular.

What is the S? And what is the atom like thing on the left?

[–] soeren@iusearchlinux.fyi 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

react vue angular svelte htmx

[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 12 points 1 year ago

My stupid brain thought the s was squarespace.... And now for our sponsor...

[–] poinck@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I think, Svelte should not salute to React (anymore). Not sure what htmx brings to the table, but Svelte should be doing the same like the Penguin labeled "htmx", because it really frees devs from doing too much stuff to get started and produces fast webpages on top of that.

load more comments
view more: next ›