this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
72 points (92.9% liked)

News

22956 readers
1634 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The more data we collect, the more we realize our assumptions about the universe may be incorrect. This is the first year data of a multi-year study on mapping the position of galaxies.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] classic@fedia.io 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is pretty cool. Rather comforting for the existential dread

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 2 points 5 months ago
[–] A_A@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Again, these observation do not fit LCDM. (...but do fit my baby model ) ... :

Dr. Riess of Johns Hopkins, who had an early look at the DESI results, noted that the “hint,” if validated, could pull the rug out from other cosmological measurements, such as the age or size of the universe.

The following is what has been observed :

As a measure of distance, the researchers used bumps in the cosmic distribution of galaxies, known as baryon acoustic oscillations. ~~These bumps were imprinted on the cosmos by sound waves in the hot plasma that filled the universe when it was just 380,000 years old. Back then, the bumps were a half-million light-years across. Now, 13.5 billion years later, the universe has expanded a thousandfold, and~~ the bumps — which are ~~now~~ 500 million light-years across — serve as convenient cosmic measuring sticks.

The DESI scientists divided the past 11 billion years of cosmic history into seven spans of time. ~~(The universe is 13.8 billion years old.)~~ For each, they measured the size of these bumps and how fast the galaxies in them were speeding away from us and from each other.

When the researchers put it all together, they found that the usual assumption — a constant dark energy — didn’t work to describe the expansion of the universe. Galaxies in the three most recent epochs appeared closer than they should have been, suggesting that dark energy could be evolving with time.

They still do not hypothesize that ~~baronic~~ barionic matter could be continually created as time goes on (which is what I say* ) but they do hypothesize that dark energy does change over time which is an equally hard hypothesis.

*i say also that space develop exponantially at constant ~~mater~~ matter (barionic) density.

Edits : ~~typpo~~ typos

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you aren't familiar with it, you might want to look into Neil Turok's theory:

https://insidetheperimeter.ca/a-mirror-universe-might-tell-a-simpler-story-neil-turok/

He and his coauthor have addressed a number of outstanding puzzles in cosmology with it, and of everything I've seen it's where I'd put my money for future gains.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

From your link :

“It’s an approach that was born out of a certain sense of frustration with previous approaches. In my view, they had all become rather complicated and contrived, including my own approaches,” Turok said during a recent Perimeter Public Lecture (...)

I like it and I share his frustrations. Thanks for this article.

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I like strong opinions, but you would sound more believable if uou made the effort to spell the critical terms correctly

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

English is not my first language. What blunder did I do ? I read everything again and I still don't see it.