this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
57 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37625 readers
257 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Given how little spotify gives to artists, I can't imagine this being a cost effective way to launder your money at all.
Yeah, I could see Steam, or the App/Play stores. 30% is a meaningful split, but it could be a reasonable layer of isolation in exchange. But Spotify?
Not even just Spotify, but first to some other 3rd party that then takes their own cut first. Utter ridiculous logic.
Also with an app you just buy it. If the app is like 10 euros that's pretty fast. But with Spotify you need to listen to streams for hours and hours, it's fucking slow.
I'm pretty sure nobody is actually listening to the songs... they would just be playing them in an empty room. Probably with a bunch of devices playing the songs at once.
I understand, but even than playing a song is much more effort (time consuming) than buying an app. It's just super inefficiënt.