this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
595 points (95.4% liked)

Socialism

5124 readers
70 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I like to think that I'm a very knowledgeable organizer, so if folks want some advice ask me in the comments!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The oligarchs is a common name for the exploiter class.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exploitation is universal amongst humans. There are no divisions, such as class, that distinguish between humans who exploit others and humans who don't exploit others. There are no groups of humans without exploitation. There are no humans who don't exploit others.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Socialists understand exploitation as the relationship by which one societal class, called owners, claims as profit value generated by the labor provided by another class, called workers.

Such kind of relationship is particular to historical periods, and is not universal or inevitable within any human society generally.

Socialists have found class analysis to be the most broadly useful framework to understand social systems.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Socialists understand exploitation as the relationship by which one societal class, called owners, claims as profit value generated by the labor provided by another class, called workers.

That's a limited understanding of exploitation.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Exploitation is simply a term chosen to describe a kind of relationship that has appeared on our current economic systems.

You are free to use the same word in other contexts, but your objection is not particularly meaningful in juxtaposition to your previous ones, and your complaints are obviously more directly motivated for obfuscation than by sincerity.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -1 points 1 year ago

You are free to use the same word in other contexts

Thanks for your permission.

your objection is not particularly meaningful

I disagree.

in juxtaposition to

LOL

your complaints are obviously more directly motivated by obfuscation than by sincerity

LOL